Peer Review Policy

Bharat International follows a double-blind peer review process: reviewers do not know who the authors are, and authors do not know who reviewed their paper.

Review Process

1. A board member screens each paper for scope, originality, format and plagiarism.
2. Papers that pass screening are sent to at least two reviewers with expertise in the subject.
3. Reviewers assess originality, relevance, methodology, clarity, references and contribution to knowledge.
4. Each reviewer recommends: accept, minor revision, major revision or reject.
5. The board makes the final decision based on the reviews and informs the author by email.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Review only papers within their expertise and decline when there is a conflict of interest.
• Keep manuscripts confidential and never use their content for personal benefit.
• Give objective, constructive and timely feedback, normally within 7 days.
• Report any suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication or data fabrication.

Timelines

Most authors receive a first decision within 7 to 15 days. Revised papers are usually re-checked within 7 days.

Appeals

Authors who disagree with a decision may appeal once by email to bharatijhk@gmail.com, explaining their reasons. The appeal is considered by a board member who was not involved in the original decision.